A 1,300 BTC transfer from an address labeled as Strategy into a new wallet. The same item framed total transfers since Feb. 20 at 2,600 BTC and cited holdings around 187,000 BTC, while wallet address 0xEAe0… sold 2,784 WEETH and 85.9 WBTC for about $5.9M USDC through CoW Protocol, with profit tagged around $444K.
A 1,300 BTC transfer can look like a supply event because it is large in absolute size. Transfers of this type often turn out to be custody and operational shuffles, especially when the destination is a fresh wallet and coins do not proceed to exchange clusters.
The flash framing also matters: it treats the move as part of a sequence, totaling 2,600 BTC moved since Feb. 20. When movements cluster over a few days, markets tend to watch for follow-through rather than overreact to a single transaction.
Treasury-linked wallet movement headlines can shape sentiment because they create a narrative vacuum. Traders often fill it with three scenarios.
One is internal custody reorganization, such as key rotation, new custodian account structure, or operational segregation.
Another is an OTC settlement workflow where coins are moved between internal wallets before delivering to a counterparty.
The third is a prelude to exchange deposits. That is the scenario that can pressure price if coins move into known deposit clusters.
The reason these headlines move markets is that Bitcoin’s marginal pricing is sensitive to perceived supply. Even if the coins never hit exchanges, the existence of a “large move” can shift short-term positioning.
The second lead is a large routed swap through CoW Protocol. CoW is an intent-based aggregation and batch-auction system, which means traders can route size across multiple sources of liquidity and reduce certain execution risks compared with dumping into a single on-chain pool.
The flash description frames the sale as 2,784 WEETH and 85.9 WBTC converted into about $5.9M USDC, with around $444K profit tagged.
The key market signal is the decision to rotate into USDC on-chain, not necessarily the specific assets sold.
A whale converting WEETH and WBTC into stables can reflect de-risking ahead of volatility, taking profits, or repositioning for a lower re-entry. Executing through CoW suggests the actor prioritized controlled execution and minimized price impact on visible DEX pools.
Because this stays on-chain, it can also precede a later move to centralized venues. Many large traders prefer to convert into stablecoins first, then decide whether to bridge, deposit to exchanges, or deploy into other on-chain strategies.
The post On-Chain Watch: Strategy-Linked BTC Shuffle and a $5.9M CoW Rotation appeared first on Crypto Adventure.
