Crypto sentiment metrics fell deeper into “Extreme Fear” on Feb 12, with the widely followed Crypto Fear & Greed Index showing a reading of 5 on the daily snapshot at Alternative.me. The same page shows the index at 11 yesterday and 12 last week, highlighting how quickly market mood deteriorated.
At the same time, CoinMarketCap’s Fear & Greed view is displaying a higher print, showing 8/100 in its page footer at the time of this check. It’s worth mentioning that Coinmarketcap also has it at 5 earlier today. That difference matters because traders often treat these gauges as interchangeable, even though they are built from different data mixes and update logic.
The “5” print spread quickly across social channels because it visually signals maximum stress. Some posts framed it as an all-time low, but CoinMarketCap’s own market write-up describing the sell-off called a “5” print the second-lowest reading ever, not necessarily the absolute lowest.
The Fear & Greed framework compresses multiple inputs into a single number, and it tends to swing hardest when volatility rises and spot flow turns one-sided.
Alternative.me describes its index as a daily sentiment number for Bitcoin and other large cryptocurrencies, combining factors like volatility, momentum and volume, social activity, dominance, and trend signals CoinMarketCap describes its own index as a proprietary tool that combines momentum, volatility, derivatives positioning, market composition, and platform engagement signals.
When February’s downside impulse intensified, the inputs that usually push the index lower likely moved in the same direction at once: realized volatility jumped, downside momentum dominated, and defensive positioning rose. Reuters’ Feb 6 market recap described a sharp intraday low near $60,017 and outsized one-day volatility during the rebound phase, underscoring why sentiment gauges can snap lower even as prices attempt to stabilize.
An index reading in the single digits usually reflects a market that is trading defensively and prioritizing liquidity.
In these conditions, spreads often widen in less-liquid alts, perpetual swap funding can compress or flip negative, and traders reduce marginal leverage. That often creates two simultaneous dynamics.
The first dynamic is forced selling risk. If liquidation pressure is still active, the market can overshoot to the downside even after sentiment looks “max fear.”
The second dynamic is capitulation and base building. If forced selling has already flushed, deep fear readings can coincide with a transition into consolidation, where price stabilizes and volatility declines before any sustained trend resumes. CoinMarketCap’s Feb 12 analysis cited multiple stress indicators during the sell-off and suggested Bitcoin could enter a consolidation range after the capitulation-style flow.
The most important follow-up is whether sentiment improves because volatility actually compresses, or because price bounces while structural stress remains.
A cleaner recovery usually includes tighter intraday ranges, improving liquidity on major pairs, and fewer abrupt wicks around key levels. If volatility stays elevated and sentiment remains pinned, the market is still vulnerable to sharp liquidation cascades.
For users, the actionable angle is operational rather than predictive. Extreme-fear regimes are where mistakes compound: rushed swaps, signing unknown approvals, and moving funds through unfamiliar bridges. Keeping transaction hygiene tight and reviewing wallet permissions becomes more important when the market is chaotic, because scams and malicious links tend to surge during drawdowns.
The post Crypto Fear and Greed Hits Extreme Fear as Bitcoin Sentiment Gauge Prints 5 appeared first on Crypto Adventure.
Also read: Coupe du monde 2026 : les prix des billets sur le site de revente de la FIFA sont scandaleux
