Google is entering the blockchain industry, developing a new Layer 1 network called the Google Cloud Universal Ledger (GCUL).
The ledger will be designed specifically for financial institutions, with a focus on supporting tokenized real-world assets, smart contracts, and settlements.
The move points to Google Cloud’s aim to become a major player in the emerging crypto industry in the US, raising important questions about how Google’s ledger will compete, or collaborate, with DLTs such as Hedera Hashgraph.
The Google Cloud Universal Ledger will be a network that combines the scalability and performance of cloud computing with the security and programmability of distributed ledger technology.
Built as a private, permissioned network, Google’s ledger is made for financial institutions that require reliability, regulatory compliance, and interoperability.
One of GCUL’s aspects is its use of Python-based smart contracts, which could make the network far more approachable for financial engineers already familiar with the programming language.
Combined with cloud delivery systems, predictable billing, and integration with Google’s broader ecosystem of services, GCUL presents itself as a streamlined, enterprise-grade ledger that reduces barriers to adoption for banks, similar to existing DLTs like Hedera.
While GCUL is still in development, Hedera Hashgraph has already secured a position as a trusted network for tokenization and institutional adoption. Known for its high throughput, low fees, and energy efficiency as a carbon-negative DLT, Hedera has a relationship with enterprises and financial firms exploring tokenized real-world assets.
The Hedera Council, overseen by major corporations and institutions, offers an amount of trust that aligns well with public ledger use cases.
HBAR’s features, such as the Hedera Token Service, Stablecoin Studio, AI Studio, and the support of the Hedera Foundation in DeFi, make institutional adoption and tokenization seamless and easy for newcomers, making HBAR a network perfect for onboarding firms and new users.
With GCUL entering the blockchain industry, Hedera could face competition in the institutional market. Google’s brand power, existing enterprise relationships, and historical reputation for reliable infrastructure give GCUL an advantage.
The ability to integrate blockchain services directly into Google Cloud environments could prove compelling for banks or fintech firms that already rely on Google’s technology.
GCUL’s positioning as a neutral, cloud-native ledger may appeal to institutions looking for regulatory ease with a focus on settlements and RWA tokenization, overlapping with Hedera’s strengths.
Competition between GCUL and Hedera could happen, despite Google being on the Hedera Council, running their own HBAR node, helping keep the Hedera DLT running and secure.
Hedera’s Hashgraph consensus is an industry outlier due to how innovative and scalable the network is. For Google to become a possible competitor, its underlying network consensus would need to be on par with that of Hashgraph’s ABFT.
Despite competitive paths, it is possible that GCUL and Hedera could work in a complementary way, rather than as competitive rivals. Hedera’s ledger and decentralized governance offer a different value proposition from GCUL’s permissioned, institution-focused approach, keeping in mind Hashgraph’s upcoming HashSphere, which will be a private ledger.
Financial institutions might choose to use Hedera for certain public-facing tokenization or data-verification use cases while leveraging GCUL for private processes within their organizations.
Interoperability between the two networks could allow assets and data to flow seamlessly. Another factor to consider is the diversity of institutional needs.
Some firms may want to prioritize decentralization and openness, which Hedera excels at. Others may favor control and permissioned privacy that GCUL may provide.
The entry of Google Cloud shows how important the blockchain industry is becoming, especially in regard to the tokenization of legacy financial assets.
Tokenized RWAs, automated payments, and 24/7 settlements are no longer theories but can now be implemented and utilized in finanical markets as firms begin tokenizing money market funds on public ledgers like Hedera.
Hedera has demonstrated real-world adoption in areas like tokenization, supply chain mechanics, and global payments. GCUL will likely accelerate this trend, bringing additional credibility, infrastructure, and resources into the crypto market.
Rather than displacing existing networks, Google’s ledger may expand the overall industry and encourage more institutional participation in decentralized finance.
The Google Cloud Universal Ledger represents a bold step into blockchain by one of the world’s largest technology companies. Its design for financial institutions, cloud-native delivery, and emphasis on tokenized assets position it as a serious contender in the institutional blockchain space.
For Hedera Hashgraph, the rise of GCUL is both a challenge and an opportunity. Competition could push Hedera to strengthen its ecosystem and expand adoption, while complementarity could lead to collaborative models that blend Hedera’s decentralized strengths with Google Cloud’s institutional reach.
In the long run, the two platforms may not be adversaries so much as parallel pillars of the tokenized finance ecosystem. Together, they could help build a more interoperable and robust digital financial infrastructure, one where traditional institutions and decentralized networks converge to create the next era of global commerce.
The post Google Universal Ledger: Competitor or Complement to Hedera ? first appeared on AllinCrypto.
Also read: Fenwick Rejects Allegations of Involvement in FTX’s Billion-Dollar Scam
