In a Chinese-language decentralized social discussion Space organized by Firefly, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin responded to a community question about exchange social products such as Binance Square. He said he has paid limited attention to Binance Square and cannot judge its content quality.
Vitalik’s broader point was directional rather than platform-specific. He said there is no inherent problem with exchanges building social products, but it is unreasonable for the whole world to be building the same kind of social product. He expressed a preference for platforms to develop distinct strengths or vertical themes, and argued that decentralized social improves when multiple clients and platforms can connect into an interoperable system rather than forcing everyone into one global feed. The Space recording is available via X’s Space page.
If the “interop dSocial” thesis gains momentum, attention tends to shift away from standalone social apps and toward the plumbing that makes social portable. That means identity, content, and the social graph start to matter as primitives, not features.
In practical terms, this narrative can move builder and investor interest toward protocols and standards that let posts, follows, and reputation travel between clients. It can also put pressure on walled-garden social products, including exchange-native feeds, to clarify whether they will remain closed distribution channels or connect into broader decentralized rails.
Vitalik’s view maps to an internet-style “network of networks” model for social. Instead of one dominant app, multiple clients could share data interfaces so users can switch frontends without losing identity or relationships.
Some of the building blocks already exist in adjacent ecosystems. Open social graph approaches like Lens and protocol-centric social networks like Farcaster aim to make client competition possible without trapping users. Standards-driven systems, including W3C’s work on Decentralized Identifiers and the social web’s ActivityPub, show how interoperability can be formalized, though crypto-native designs often add wallet-based identity, on-chain actions, and programmable permissions.
The main bottleneck is not vision, it is integration detail. The remark is best understood by listening to the full Space context and then watching whether teams publish concrete interoperability specs that define how identity, content formats, moderation signals, and cross-client portability would work in production. Exchange-social products are also part of the story, because even a small change in how an exchange feed connects to external social graphs can reshape discovery, distribution, and listing narratives.
Vitalik’s comment on Binance Square is less a verdict and more a framing: he has not tracked it closely enough to judge, but he wants decentralized social to mature into an interoperable layer where many platforms can connect and compete. If that framing spreads, the next wave of dSocial attention will likely concentrate on identity, content portability, and shared social graph infrastructure rather than isolated apps.
The post Vitalik Shrugs on Binance Square, Calls for Interoperable dSocial Layer appeared first on Crypto Adventure.
Also read: Steam : voici la liste des 29 périodes de promotions de l’année 2026
