In a development that could fundamentally reshape America’s monetary policy, eighteen cryptocurrency industry leaders convened with Congressional lawmakers on September 16, 2025, to advance the BITCOIN Act, landmark legislation proposing the acquisition of 1 million Bitcoin for the U.S. Strategic Reserve. The high-stakes meeting, hosted by The Digital Chamber and The Digital Power Network, brought together influential figures including MicroStrategy Chairman Michael Saylor, Marathon Digital Holdings CEO Fred Thiel, and Fundstrat CEO Tom Lee, alongside key Republican senators Ted Cruz, Marsha Blackburn, and the bill’s chief sponsor, Senator Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming.
The roundtable follows global trends featured in Bitcoin news, as nations worldwide increasingly consider cryptocurrency as a strategic reserve asset. At current market prices hovering around $115,000 per Bitcoin, the proposed acquisition would represent an investment exceeding $115 billion, positioning the United States to control approximately 5% of Bitcoin’s total supply—a move that could cement American dominance in the digital asset landscape for generations to come.
The timing of this congressional push is particularly significant, coming six months after President Donald Trump signed an executive order on March 6, 2025, establishing the foundation for a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. The executive order establishes a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve as a permanent reserve asset, funded by Treasury’s forfeited bitcoin, utilizing the approximately 198,000 Bitcoin already held by the federal government through various enforcement actions. However, legislative advocates argue that congressional action is necessary to transform this temporary executive measure into enduring law.
The BITCOIN Act is back. pic.twitter.com/WNeU6SWPj3
— Senator Cynthia Lummis (@SenLummis) March 11, 2025
The Boosting Innovation, Technology, and Competitiveness through Optimized Investment Nationwide (BITCOIN) Act of 2025, reintroduced by Senator Lummis and Representative Nick Begich on March 11, represents the most ambitious cryptocurrency legislation in U.S. history. The bill directs the acquisition of 1 million Bitcoin over a five-year period, mirroring the scale and strategic importance of U.S. gold reserves, with purchases structured at 200,000 Bitcoin annually to minimize market disruption.
What distinguishes this proposal from typical government spending initiatives is its commitment to fiscal neutrality. The legislation explicitly avoids new taxpayer burdens, instead proposing innovative funding mechanisms that leverage existing federal resources. These include the revaluation of Treasury gold certificates, utilization of Federal Reserve remittances, and potential deployment of tariff revenues—a strategy that has garnered support from budget-conscious legislators who might otherwise oppose such an ambitious acquisition program.
The technical infrastructure proposed for the reserve demonstrates sophisticated understanding of cryptocurrency security requirements. The bill mandates establishment of a decentralized network of secure cold storage facilities across the United States, implementing military-grade security protocols and quarterly proof-of-reserve attestations to ensure transparent management and accountability. This approach addresses concerns about centralization risks while maintaining the highest standards of asset protection.
Particularly noteworthy is the legislation’s 20-year minimum holding period, which prevents any administration from liquidating the reserve for short-term political gains. Upon the expiration of the minimum holding period, the Secretary shall not recommend selling more than 10 percent of the assets of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve during any 2-year period, ensuring the reserve functions as a genuine long-term strategic asset rather than a speculative trading position.
The cryptocurrency markets have responded with measured optimism to the congressional deliberations, with Bitcoin maintaining relative stability around the $115,000 level throughout September 2025. This represents a remarkable evolution from the violent price swings that characterized earlier Bitcoin cycles, with current 30-day volatility measures showing unprecedented stability at approximately 3.5%, approaching traditional asset classes like gold.
Historical price data from CoinGlass and BiTBO confirms that at 8%, Bitcoin’s September 2025 upside is its second-best ever according to Cointelegraph, breaking the traditional “Red September” pattern that has historically plagued cryptocurrency markets. This performance suggests growing institutional confidence in Bitcoin’s maturation as an asset class, even as debates over its strategic reserve status continue.
Professional traders and institutional investors are closely monitoring several key technical levels. The immediate resistance zone sits between $116,400 and $117,000, with strong support established at $115,000. A decisive break above $120,000 could catalyze movement toward the Fibonacci extension targets between $129,000 and $135,000, levels that many analysts view as achievable should the BITCOIN Act gain legislative momentum.
The potential price impact of a 1 million Bitcoin acquisition program cannot be understated. With daily trading volumes averaging $46 billion, the systematic purchase of 200,000 Bitcoin annually would represent significant sustained demand pressure. Market microstructure analysis suggests that such consistent institutional buying could establish a perpetual bid under the market, potentially driving prices toward the $200,000 level that several prominent analysts, including Fundstrat’s Tom Lee, have forecasted for late 2025.
Central to the congressional advocacy effort is Michael Saylor, whose company MicroStrategy has become the corporate world’s most aggressive Bitcoin accumulator. MicroStrategy holds 638,985 Bitcoin worth about $47.23 billion by September 2025, a position that has transformed the once-struggling software company into a de facto Bitcoin investment vehicle with a market capitalization almost entirely derived from its cryptocurrency holdings.
The Strategic Bitcoin Reserve represents a strategy for U.S. digital supremacy in the 21st century. In this presentation, I discuss why Bitcoin is critical to our nation's prosperity and how America can become the global Bitcoin superpower. pic.twitter.com/5e6PpxSgzM
— Michael Saylor(@saylor) March 12, 2025
Saylor’s presence at the congressional roundtable carries particular weight given his track record of successful Bitcoin advocacy and his company’s pioneering development of corporate Bitcoin acquisition strategies. According to CoinDesk’s interview with Saylor, his famous assertion that “every Bitcoin you do not purchase is a $13 million error” has become a rallying cry for corporate treasurers considering cryptocurrency allocations, and his detailed frameworks for Bitcoin accounting and custody have provided blueprints that dozens of public companies have subsequently adopted.
The corporate adoption narrative extends far beyond MicroStrategy. Companies like Tesla, Block (formerly Square), and numerous smaller firms have collectively accumulated hundreds of thousands of Bitcoin, creating a powerful constituency supporting favorable cryptocurrency regulation. These corporate holders represent a stabilizing force in the Bitcoin market, as their long-term investment horizons and sophisticated treasury management practices differ markedly from retail speculation.
Despite enthusiastic Republican support, the BITCOIN Act faces significant political headwinds. Currently, the bill only has support from Republican lawmakers, with no Democrats yet to endorse it, creating a challenging path through the closely divided Congress. The legislation requires hearings before both the House Financial Services Committee and the Senate Banking Committee, neither of which has scheduled formal discussions as of September 2025.
The Republican coalition supporting the bill includes influential figures beyond Senators Lummis, Cruz, and Blackburn. Senator Marshall, Senator Tuberville, and Representative Harrigan have emerged as vocal advocates, arguing that Bitcoin reserves could strengthen dollar hegemony rather than undermining it—a counterintuitive position that has sparked intense debate among monetary policy experts.
Democratic skepticism centers on several concerns: Bitcoin’s environmental impact from mining operations, its historical association with illicit activities, questions about price stability, and philosophical objections to government speculation in volatile assets. Progressive Democrats like Senator Elizabeth Warren have raised pointed questions about potential conflicts of interest, particularly given the cryptocurrency industry’s substantial political donations during the 2024 election cycle.
However, political dynamics may be shifting. The successful passage of the GENIUS Act establishing a stablecoin regulatory framework in July 2025 demonstrated unexpected bipartisan cooperation on digital asset legislation. Moderate Democrats from technology-forward states like Colorado and California have privately expressed openness to strategic reserve concepts, suggesting potential for compromise if concerns about speculation and market manipulation can be adequately addressed.
The urgency surrounding the BITCOIN Act reflects growing awareness of international competition in digital asset accumulation. While the United States currently holds the largest known government Bitcoin position globally, other nations are rapidly developing their own strategic approaches to cryptocurrency reserves.
El Salvador’s pioneering Bitcoin adoption has evolved from an experimental policy to a profitable investment, with the nation’s holdings now exceeding 6,100 Bitcoin worth approximately $550 million. Bhutan’s hydroelectric-powered mining operations have quietly accumulated Bitcoin reserves representing 28% of the small nation’s GDP, demonstrating how cryptocurrency can provide economic leverage for smaller nations.
Perhaps most concerning for U.S. policymakers are reports of coordinated Bitcoin accumulation efforts by geopolitical rivals. Russia’s central bank has reportedly been exploring Bitcoin as a sanctions-resistant reserve asset, while China’s complex relationship with cryptocurrency—banning domestic trading while potentially accumulating reserves through state-owned enterprises—adds another layer of strategic complexity.
Japan’s recent indications of interest in Bitcoin reserves, combined with similar discussions in Paraguay, Brazil, and several European nations, suggest an accelerating global trend toward cryptocurrency integration into national financial strategies. This international momentum provides both competitive pressure and political cover for U.S. legislators considering the BITCOIN Act.
The proposed implementation of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve would require unprecedented coordination between federal agencies and the development of novel custody solutions. The legislation envisions a multi-signature custody arrangement distributed across geographically diverse locations, incorporating both online operational wallets for potential future transactions and deep cold storage for long-term holdings.
Cybersecurity experts have emphasized the critical importance of quantum-resistant security measures, given the 20-year minimum holding period and rapid advances in quantum computing. The proposed quarterly proof-of-reserve requirements would provide transparency through cryptographic attestation without revealing specific wallet addresses or compromising operational security—a delicate balance that would establish new standards for government cryptocurrency custody.
Integration with existing Treasury systems presents additional complexity. The Federal Reserve’s real-time gross settlement system, Treasury’s cash management operations, and various regulatory reporting frameworks would all require substantial modifications to accommodate Bitcoin holdings. These technical challenges, while surmountable, highlight the transformative nature of the proposed legislation.
The macroeconomic implications of a U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve extend far beyond potential investment returns. Proponents argue that Bitcoin reserves could provide a hedge against dollar debasement, offer optionality in an increasingly digital global economy, and position the United States as the definitive leader in financial innovation.
Critics counter that Bitcoin’s correlation with risk assets during market stress, its limited real-world utility compared to traditional reserves, and its concentrated ownership distribution make it unsuitable as a strategic reserve asset. A February 2025 University of Chicago survey found zero percent support among surveyed economists for government Bitcoin purchases, though industry observers note that academic economists have historically been skeptical of cryptocurrency innovations that later gained mainstream acceptance.
The fiscal neutrality provisions of the BITCOIN Act attempt to address concerns about opportunity cost and resource allocation. By utilizing Federal Reserve remittances and gold certificate revaluations rather than new appropriations, the legislation seeks to minimize disruption to existing government programs while capturing potential upside from Bitcoin appreciation.
During the September 16 roundtable, industry leaders presented a compelling vision of Bitcoin’s role in America’s financial future. According to CoinGape’s coverage of the meeting, the Strategy co-founder added that BTC is reshaping the global financial landscape and that the U.S. ought to benefit from and lead in it, emphasizing the first-mover advantages available to nations that embrace digital asset innovation.
The newly formed Treasury Council, which sent a joint letter to Congress supporting the BITCOIN Act, argued that strategic Bitcoin reserves would strengthen U.S. monetary stability, hedge against systemic risks, and reinforce American global financial leadership. These arguments resonate particularly strongly given concerns about de-dollarization efforts by BRICS nations and the growing importance of digital currencies in international trade.
Mining companies represented at the roundtable, including Marathon Digital, Riot Platforms, and CleanSpark, emphasized the potential for Bitcoin reserves to stimulate domestic energy innovation and create high-paying jobs in the technology sector. Their vision extends beyond simple asset accumulation to encompass a comprehensive digital asset strategy that could position the United States as the undisputed global leader in cryptocurrency infrastructure.
As Congress enters the final quarter of 2025, the BITCOIN Act’s supporters face a narrow window for legislative action. The upcoming committee hearings will prove crucial in building broader support and addressing concerns from skeptical legislators. Advocates are pursuing a multi-pronged strategy that includes educational briefings for congressional staff, coordination with state-level initiatives, and sustained public advocacy to build grassroots pressure.
The parallel success of state-level Bitcoin reserve initiatives provides important momentum. Texas’s establishment of a state Bitcoin reserve funded with an initial $5 billion allocation has demonstrated practical implementation strategies that federal legislators can reference. Similar initiatives progressing in ten other states create a laboratory for policy experimentation that could inform federal approaches. According to The Block’s analysis, this state-level momentum could prove crucial in building congressional support.
Industry observers anticipate that the first formal committee hearings could occur as early as October 2025, with potential floor votes before year-end if committee deliberations prove favorable. However, the complexity of the legislation and the need for extensive technical review could push final consideration into 2026, particularly if amendments are required to build bipartisan support.
The September 16 congressional roundtable represents more than routine legislative deliberation—it marks a potential inflection point in the evolution of global monetary systems. Whether the BITCOIN Act ultimately succeeds or fails, the serious consideration of Bitcoin as a strategic reserve asset by the world’s largest economy signals cryptocurrency’s definitive arrival as a permanent feature of the global financial landscape.
For cryptocurrency investors and enthusiasts, the current moment offers both tremendous opportunity and considerable uncertainty. The potential establishment of a U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve would likely catalyze unprecedented institutional adoption and potentially drive prices to levels that seemed fantastical just years ago. Conversely, legislative failure could trigger short-term market disappointment, though the underlying technological and economic drivers of Bitcoin adoption would remain intact.
As Senator Lummis noted in introducing the legislation, the goal is to transform “the president’s visionary executive action into enduring law,” creating a framework that transcends political cycles and establishes Bitcoin as a permanent component of America’s financial architecture. Whether this vision becomes reality will depend on the complex interplay of political will, economic analysis, and the evolving understanding of Bitcoin’s role in an increasingly digital future.
Also read: Cardano Founder Shares Update After CLARITY Act Roundtable
