mBit Casino is currently owned and operated by Scores55 Tech B.V., a company registered in Curaçao (registration number 162990), licensed by the Curaçao Gaming Authority under license number OGL/2024/1307/0748. That’s confirmed directly on mBit’s own site.
You’ll still find plenty of sources — including some published within the last few weeks — describing mBit as owned by Dama N.V. or even Direx N.V. Here’s the actual timeline, and why those older names keep showing up.
mBit launched as one of the earliest Bitcoin-native casinos, part of the same original portfolio as BitStarz and 7Bit, built on the SoftSwiss platform under the legal and operational management of Direx N.V.
Direx N.V.’s brand portfolio moved to the newly established Dama N.V., under new management, on the same SoftSwiss infrastructure. [The most precise documented date for this transition comes from mBit’s current sister brand 7Bit — autumn 2020 specifically — though the broader Direx-to-Dama migration across the whole portfolio is generally dated to late 2019/early 2020 in other sources. The exact date for mBit specifically isn’t independently confirmed.]
Following Curaçao’s regulatory overhaul, Dama N.V. held Curaçao Gaming Authority license OGL/2023/174/0082 for its brand portfolio. [Confirmed for 7Bit specifically; inferred for mBit given the shared entity, not independently verified for mBit.]
mBit and 7Bit both moved onto a new operating entity, Scores55 Tech B.V., under license OGL/2024/1307/0748. This date is directly documented for 7Bit; mBit shares the exact same license number today, which is strong evidence the two moved together, though mBit’s own specific transition date isn’t separately confirmed.
mBit Casino is owned and operated by Scores55 Tech B.V. (registration 162990, Willemstad, Curaçao), under Curaçao Gaming Authority license OGL/2024/1307/0748 — confirmed directly on mBit’s own official gaming-license page.
Worth knowing about the broader context: Dama N.V. — mBit’s operator through most of its history — has faced sustained regulatory scrutiny separate from any individual brand’s own conduct. Australia’s communications regulator (ACMA) issued formal warnings against Dama N.V. repeatedly between 2022 and 2025, covering more than a dozen different brands, for offering unlicensed gambling services to Australian customers.
We haven’t found mBit specifically named in any ACMA warning, so this is offered as context for why the broader Dama portfolio has been restructuring, not a claim about mBit itself. [See the fuller treatment of this, and the Curaçao licensing reform, in our BitStarz ownership piece.]
Here’s the precise, correct answer, not just an educated guess: mBit and 7Bit share the same operating entity and license (Scores55 Tech B.V., OGL/2024/1307/0748) — and they’re not alone. At least two more brands, Mirax Casino and KatsuBet, currently operate under this exact same license too.
That’s not unusual or a red flag — it’s the expected shape of how Curaçao licensing actually works post-reform. The 2024 regulatory overhaul (the LOK) didn’t ban one entity from hosting multiple brands; it required whoever hosts multiple brands to hold a direct, publicly accountable license themselves, replacing the old, much less transparent master/sub-license system. Scores55 Tech B.V. operating as a multi-brand host for mBit, 7Bit, Mirax, and KatsuBet is a legitimate continuation of the standard SoftSwiss white-label model — just with real regulatory oversight attached now, instead of none.
What sharing a license actually tells you, and what it doesn’t. “Sister site” is a term worth being precise about, since it implies more similarity than it actually guarantees. What’s genuinely shared and verifiable here: the licensed operator, the underlying SoftSwiss platform technology, and the Curaçao regulatory umbrella.
What isn’t necessarily shared, and often isn’t: customer service, risk management, and payment method support are frequently handled by entirely separate teams or third-party vendors per brand — one might use SoftSwiss’s in-house support and risk infrastructure while another outsources the same functions elsewhere, and one might accept fiat alongside crypto while another stays crypto-only.
These are independent operational decisions, not something the shared license or backend determines. That also means comparing two “sister” sites’ support quality or payout speed doesn’t actually tell you anything about their shared ownership — it’s just two separate brand reviews that happen to share a license number.
mBit and 7Bit also maintain entirely separate, non-overlapping affiliate programs (mbitpartners.com and 7bitpartners.com), consistent with how independently these brands appear to operate day to day.
As with other casinos in this space, a named director or officer on file for a Curaçao-registered company isn’t always the person who actually controls or profits from the business — professional nominee arrangements are common practice in offshore corporate structures generally. The corporate entity and its license here are verifiable facts; a specific controlling individual behind Scores55 Tech B.V. isn’t something we’re asserting one way or the other.
The post Who Owns mBit Casino? appeared first on BitcoinChaser.
