An NFT approval is a permission. Instead of transferring an NFT immediately, the owner authorizes another address to move that NFT in the future. That “other address” can be a marketplace contract, a lending protocol, a vault, or any smart contract that needs to move NFTs as part of a workflow.
This permission exists because most NFT apps aim for an escrowless experience. A user lists an NFT, then the marketplace completes the trade later, when a buyer arrives. The marketplace can only do that if it can transfer the NFT at the moment of sale.
The tradeoff is simple. Approvals reduce friction for legitimate apps, but they create a persistent attack surface if the approved operator is malicious, compromised, or simply no longer needed.
The Ethereum NFT standard supports approvals explicitly. The ERC-721 standard defines two approval mechanisms that wallets usually show as “Approve” and “Set Approval For All.”
Token-level approval grants permission for a specific NFT, identified by its tokenId.
Mechanism-first view:
This model is precise. It is useful when an app only needs control of one NFT, such as a one-off OTC sale, an NFT collateral vault for a single item, or a bespoke auction contract.
The approval is also fragile in a good way. Under typical ERC-721 implementations, when the NFT is transferred, the token-level approval is cleared, so the previous approved address does not keep control after ownership changes.
Operator approval is broader. It grants permission to manage every ERC-721 token the owner holds within that specific NFT contract.
Mechanism-first view:
OpenZeppelin’s ERC-721 interface list shows both approval paths clearly, including approve, setApprovalForAll, getApproved, and isApprovedForAll in its ERC-721 reference.
A critical nuance is scope. setApprovalForAll does not approve all NFTs in the wallet across every collection. It approves “all tokens owned by that owner inside this one NFT contract.” If the user holds NFTs from 20 collections, approvals are still separate per collection.
NFTs move through transferFrom or safeTransferFrom. A contract must enforce that only the owner or an authorized party can transfer.
In a typical ERC-721 implementation, a transfer succeeds if the caller is the owner, the token-level approved address, or an approved operator. OpenZeppelin summarizes this access check with the internal pattern isApprovedOrOwner, which is documented in its ERC-721 implementation notes.
safeTransferFrom adds a safety check for contract recipients. If the destination is a smart contract, it must implement onERC721Received to confirm it can handle NFTs. That rule reduces accidental loss when sending NFTs to contracts that cannot receive them.
Many NFT marketplaces are designed to execute trades after a listing, without the seller being online. That requires one of two models.
The first model is custody. The user deposits the NFT into an escrow contract, and the marketplace transfers from escrow at sale time. That reduces approval risk but increases custody risk and friction.
The second model is approval-based selling. The user keeps custody, but authorizes the marketplace to transfer at the moment a buyer purchases. This is why marketplace UIs often request setApprovalForAll. It allows the marketplace to transfer the sold item immediately, without asking the seller to sign again.
Operator approval is also used for bulk actions such as listing multiple NFTs, accepting bids, or moving NFTs into a vault that manages many items.
Not all NFTs are ERC-721. Many gaming items and semi-fungible assets use ERC-1155, which can represent multiple token types inside one contract.
ERC-1155 uses an operator approval model similar to setApprovalForAll. The key difference is that ERC-1155 approvals are generally “all token types” in that contract for that owner, not per tokenId approvals in the same way.
Ethereum.org’s ERC-1155 overview describes “batch approval” and the standard pattern where an operator can transfer tokens on behalf of the owner once approved.
Practical implication:
Some NFT apps try to reduce friction further by using signature-based approvals. Instead of sending an on-chain approve transaction first, the user signs a message, and the protocol submits that signature on-chain to set approval.
The EIP-4494 specification extends permit-style approvals to ERC-721. Conceptually, it brings ERC-2612 style “permit” UX to NFTs.
This affects risk in two ways.
First, users may think they are only signing a message, not granting transfer power. Second, the signature can be captured by a malicious site and used by an attacker if the permit design does not enforce tight deadlines and correct domain separation.
Clear signing and typed data displays matter more in this world, because the user must understand what their signature authorizes.
The most damaging NFT drains often start with setApprovalForAll. Once an attacker controls an approved operator address, they can transfer NFTs out without additional prompts.
This is why many safety guides treat operator approvals as high-risk. The security problem is not mysterious. It is a permission that persists until revoked.
A strong mental model is: operator approval is closer to giving someone a key than sending a package. If the key goes to the wrong party, assets can leave later.
Revoking is usually done by setting approval to false or clearing a token-level approval. Revocation is an on-chain action, which means gas costs apply.
A simple workflow is to review approvals on an explorer tool and revoke those no longer needed. For Ethereum, Etherscan provides a practical interface that many users rely on, and the same site hosts the Token Approval Checker that can help identify and revoke approvals.
Wallets and security tools also increasingly surface approvals directly, but the principle remains the same: reduce the number of active operators, especially for high-value collections.
NFT approvals are not automatically unsafe. They become unsafe when permissions are broad, persistent, and granted under uncertainty.
Several habits reduce the risk sharply.
These steps work because most drains rely on speed and ambiguity. Removing ambiguity and cutting persistent permissions lowers the attack surface.
NFT approvals are the permission layer that lets marketplaces, vaults, and protocols transfer NFTs later. In ERC-721, approve covers a single tokenId and setApprovalForAll covers all tokens within one collection contract. In ERC-1155, operator approvals can cover multiple token IDs within that contract. Approvals enable escrowless trading, but they also create long-lived risk when granted to malicious operators. Reviewing and revoking unused approvals, preferring narrow permissions, and refusing unclear signature requests are the most practical ways to stay safe.
The post What Are NFT Approvals and How Do They Work appeared first on Crypto Adventure.
Also read: Axiom And Nethermind Ship Verified OpenVM Update
