Summary
Six Ethereum researchers submitted a draft on August 4 that would gradually burn the rewards paid to validators, aiming to stop the network’s staking ratio from climbing past roughly half of all circulating ETH. The proposal is numbered EIP-8361 and named Tapered Issuance Burn, and it lists Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake among its six authors. It was submitted close to a proposal deadline for the next scheduled upgrade, and that proximity fed a sense among some developers that a change this large was being pushed through too fast.
Ethereum pays validators new ETH for securing the chain, and that reward already shrinks slowly as more validators join. EIP-8361 adds a second mechanism on top. As the staked share rises, the protocol would deduct and destroy a growing slice of each validator’s consensus reward every epoch, starting small and increasing in a straight line with the ratio. The bite reaches validators long before any ceiling comes into view. About 33% of all ETH sits staked today, close to 40 million coins, and running the formula at that level pulls the annual yield from around 2.6% down to roughly 1.1%. Half the base yield gone on day one, before the ratio moves at all.
| Staking ratio | Staked ETH | What the burn does | Net issuance to validators |
|---|---|---|---|
| ~20% | ~24M | small deduction | peaks near 0.5% of supply/yr |
| ~33% (today) | ~40M | ~55% of the reward | yield ~1.1% (from ~2.6%) |
| ~50% (the cap) | ~60.25M | 100% | zero issuance |
Issuance peaks near 20% staked, then the rising burn pulls net yield toward zero as staking approaches the cap.
The burn reaches one part of a validator’s pay and leaves the rest alone. Consensus-layer rewards, the ETH earned for attestations and for proposing blocks, are what get taxed away and destroyed. Anything earned on the execution layer flows through in full, no matter where the staking ratio sits. The point the authors keep returning to is Ethereum’s issuance curve, which pays a yield of around 1.5% even in a world where every last coin is staked. That floor never switches off, and they treat it as a standing invitation to keep piling ETH into whatever makes staking easiest, from large exchanges and spot ETFs to liquid staking providers like Lido. Concentration there hands a shrinking set of operators outsized sway over how the chain gets validated.
|
Attestation rewards |
Priority fees and transaction tips |
Mike Silagadze, chief executive of Ether.Fi, argues that trimming base rewards hits the smallest validators hardest. A home staker running one node leans on that consensus reward, while a large institutional operator carries lower per-validator costs and pulls revenue from other services, so a blunt cut could speed up the exact consolidation the proposal claims to fight. Aave founder Stani Kulechov raised a different problem. Staking yields prop up a stack of DeFi activity built on liquid staking tokens, and Kulechov warned that collapsing the yield would drain institutional appetite for ETH and could flip some looped strategies from profitable into loss-making. Then there is the timing. The draft appeared just before an August 6 deadline for proposing EIPs for the Hegotá upgrade, and several core developers called the window far too short for a change of this weight. That deadline is only for putting proposals forward rather than approving them, and no request to add EIP-8361 to Hegotá had actually been opened, so part of the “rushed” objection rests on how the deadline was read.
Ethereum should not focus on gaming staking issuance and cutting staking rewards. That is not the problem Ethereum needs to solve.
Ethereum is still an unfinished product when it comes to serving the financial system. At the protocol level, the priorities are privacy,…
— Stani (@StaniKulechov) August 5, 2026
EIP-8361 sits at Draft stage, the earliest point in the process. The authors say a working version already runs in the Prysm consensus client, but no client team has committed to shipping it, and given the pushback and the deadline it brushed against, the draft looks likely to miss the Hegotá cycle while reviewers work through it. A version that did clear review would still arrive slowly. The authors pair an estimated six-month lead time before a fork with an eighteen-month window to phase the reductions in, so nothing in the current draft touches validator rewards this year.
Ethereum is trading around $1,875 on the 4-hour chart, holding just above the 0.236 Fibonacci retracement at $1,870.68. That level comes from the recovery leg that began at the July bottom near $1,512 and topped out at $1,981, and price has spent three weeks working the upper portion of that move rather than giving much back. The $1,981 high has turned buyers away three times, on the mid-July spike, at a lower high around July 22, and again into the final week of the month, which leaves a fairly clear ceiling overhead.
Underneath, the 0.382 retracement at $1,802 marks the floor of the consolidation, and price has not closed back below it since reclaiming it in mid-July. What stands out is where buyers keep defending, closer to $1,840 than to that floor, so demand is stepping in earlier than it strictly needs to. RSI reads 52 against its 48 signal line, and there was no bearish divergence at the highs, so the rejections up there look like supply at an obvious level rather than fading strength.
The setup is a defined range with $1,870 acting as the magnet in the middle. A sustained close above $1,981 opens room toward the prior highs. A loss of the $1,840 shelf followed by a break beneath $1,802 flips the structure and puts the lower half of the retracement back in play. Between those two lines, continued chop is the base case until the market picks a side.
Price action will not decide EIP-8361. Researchers have pitched capping or lowering issuance in earlier rounds, and each attempt stalled on the same tension between paying enough to keep the chain secure and paying so much that stake concentrates in a few large operators. What differs this time is the specificity. EIP-8361 attaches a hard figure, roughly 60.25 million ETH, to the point where the reward switches off, and that number gives the debate a concrete line to defend or attack whatever becomes of this particular draft.
Burned (consensus layer)
Kept in full (execution layer)