That contrast has triggered concern inside the U.S. crypto industry. Executives now warn that policy choices meant to contain risk could instead weaken America’s position in digital payments at the exact moment international competition is heating up.
Beijing is taking a notable step to revive interest in its central bank digital currency. Beginning in 2026, banks will be permitted to offer interest on balances held in the digital yuan, also known as the e-CNY. That decision marks a shift away from treating the currency purely as digital cash.
By adding yield, China is effectively positioning the e-CNY closer to a bank deposit than a payment-only instrument. The move is widely viewed as an attempt to accelerate adoption after years of pilots failed to gain mass traction. Interest-bearing balances could also make the digital yuan more attractive for cross-border trade and settlements, particularly in regions already integrated with China’s financial system.
Across the Pacific, the debate is moving in the opposite direction. In the United States, the GENIUS Act restricts dollar-backed stablecoin issuers from paying interest or rewards to users, reflecting lawmakers’ desire to prevent stablecoins from functioning like savings products.
That restriction is now being reevaluated as enforcement discussions unfold. Faryar Shirzad, the chief policy officer at Coinbase, has argued that a hard ban on rewards could backfire. In his view, digital currencies compete on usability and incentives, not just regulatory approval. If U.S. stablecoins are locked into a payment-only role while foreign alternatives offer yield, users may simply migrate elsewhere.
From Coinbase’s perspective, the original goal of the GENIUS Act was to help compliant, dollar-backed stablecoins scale globally. Overly strict enforcement, Shirzad warns, risks undermining that ambition and weakening the dollar’s digital footprint.
The disagreement is not limited to crypto companies. In December, the Blockchain Association and more than 125 firms urged U.S. lawmakers to avoid expanding or aggressively enforcing the reward ban. They argue there is little evidence that stablecoin incentives threaten community banks and warn that innovation could be pushed offshore.
Traditional banking groups see it differently. The American Bankers Association has called for strict enforcement, claiming that reward programs already blur the line between stablecoins and deposits and could pull funds out of the banking system.
Taken together, these developments highlight a broader shift. Digital currencies are no longer just financial products – they are becoming tools of geopolitical influence. China is experimenting with incentives to expand the reach of its sovereign currency, while the U.S. risks constraining its private-sector alternatives through regulation.
The concern voiced by Coinbase and others is that the outcome may not hinge on technology, but on policy design. As countries compete to define the future of digital payments, the balance between safety, innovation, and global competitiveness is becoming harder to maintain.
How the GENIUS Act is ultimately enforced could determine whether U.S. dollar stablecoins remain attractive on the world stage – or whether yield-bearing foreign digital currencies begin to pull ahead.
The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
The post Coinbase Warns U.S. Stablecoin Limits Could Boost Foreign Digital Currencies appeared first on Coindoo.
