Bitcoin’s Quantum Dilemma: Is BIP-361 a Security Shield or Legalized Theft?

16-Apr-2026 Medium » Coinmonks

The debate over Bitcoin’s immutability has reached a boiling point. As we approach the 2030s, the “Quantum Threat” is no longer science fiction. A new proposal, BIP-361, suggests invalidating old digital signatures to prevent potential North Korean quantum attacks by 2033.

The Controversy: Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has slammed the proposal, labeling it “shitcoin land.” The plan involves a strict 5-year timeline: if Satoshi Nakamoto (or any early holder) doesn’t move their coins to a quantum-resistant address, those 1.1 million BTC become “frozen” or invalid.

The Core Conflict:

  • Security: Preventing a $70B+ theft that could crash the network.
  • Principles: Violating the “not your keys, not your coins” mantra by forcing address invalidation.

Is the survival of the network worth breaking its most sacred rule? Read more on why this soft fork might be the most contested moment in Bitcoin history.


Bitcoin’s Quantum Dilemma: Is BIP-361 a Security Shield or Legalized Theft? was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Also read: CRYPTO NEWS OF THE WEEK April 8–15, 2026 | NordFX
About Author Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nunc fermentum lectus eget interdum varius. Curabitur ut nibh vel velit cursus molestie. Cras sed sagittis erat. Nullam id ante hendrerit, lobortis justo ac, fermentum neque. Mauris egestas maximus tortor. Nunc non neque a quam sollicitudin facilisis. Maecenas posuere turpis arcu, vel tempor ipsum tincidunt ut.
WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?
Related News