Bitcoin ETFs Update: Daily Net Outflows Hit $188.64M as IBIT Leads Losses

24-Dec-2025 Blockonomi

TLDR

  • IBIT and FBTC combined for $172.64M in outflows, making up the bulk of the -$188.64M net daily outflow on Dec. 23.
  • Total cumulative net inflows across all Bitcoin ETFs remained high at $57.08B, showing continued long-term investment interest.
  • Grayscale’s GBTC ETF was the only fund with a negative cumulative inflow, standing at -$25.15B despite $14.55B in assets.
  • Several mid-tier ETFs like ARKB, HODL, BTCW, and DEFI posted no inflows or outflows, reflecting a pause in investor movement.
  • Total net assets across Bitcoin ETFs reached $114.29B, with $3.16B traded during the day, indicating active market participation.

According to a recent SoSoValue update as of December 23, the total daily net inflow across Bitcoin ETFs stood at -$188.64 million, reflecting capital outflows. Despite this, the cumulative net inflow remained strong at $57.08 billion, showing long-term investor interest. The total value traded on the day was $3.16 billion, while total net assets across the ETFs reached $114.29 billion.

IBIT and FBTC Bitcoin ETFs Post Combined $172M Outflow

Tracking the market performance of the individual Bitcoin ETFs, BlackRock’s IBIT ETF recorded the highest net outflow at $157.34 million, losing 1.79K BTC in a single day. However, IBIT still held the largest cumulative net inflow at $62.34 billion and led net assets with $67.90 billion. It maintained a 3.88% share of the Bitcoin ETF market with a market price of $49.65.

Bitcoin ETFs
Source: SoSoValue (Bitcoin ETFs)

Fidelity’s FBTC ETF saw a daily net outflow of $15.30 million, equivalent to 174.27 BTC in losses. Its cumulative net inflow stood at $12.19 billion, with net assets valued at $17.77 billion. FBTC’s market share was 1.02% and traded at a price of $76.34.

Grayscale’s GBTC and BITB Record Outflows While Spot BTC ETF Holds Steady

Grayscale’s GBTC ETF recorded a $10.28 million net outflow and lost 117.06 BTC on the day. It remained the only ETF with a negative cumulative net inflow at -$25.15 billion. GBTC’s net assets totaled $14.55 billion with a market price of $68.50 and a 0.83% BTC share.

Grayscale’s spot BTC ETF registered no inflows or outflows, keeping its cumulative net inflow at $1.95 billion. It held $4.25 billion in net assets and traded at $38.79 per share with a 0.24% BTC share. The ETF had a daily value traded of $96.65 million.

Bitwise’s BITB ETF posted a net outflow of $5.72 million and lost 65.21 BTC on the day. It reported $2.13 billion in cumulative net inflows and $3.39 billion in net assets. The ETF’s share of the BTC market stood at 0.19% with a trading price of $47.61.

Mid-Tier Bitcoin ETFs Steady as Inflows Pause

Ark Invest’s ARKB ETF had no net inflows or outflows and kept its net assets at $3.30 billion. VanEck’s HODL ETF also had no inflows, holding steady at $1.10 billion in net assets. Invesco’s BTCO ETF posted a positive cumulative net inflow of $215.55 million and traded at $87.30.

Franklin’s EZBC ETF held $512.88 million in net assets and posted a daily trading volume of 273.17K shares. Valkyrie’s BRRR ETF followed with $506.42 million in net assets and 198.39K in daily share volume. WisdomTree’s BTCW ETF had $44.83 million in net assets, with no net inflows or outflows.

Hashdex’s DEFI ETF also posted no daily inflow or outflow and remained at -$1.45 million cumulative net inflow. Its net assets stood at $11.91 million with a market price of $99.28. Most Bitcoin ETFs experienced negative price changes, ranging between -0.67% and -0.88%, reflecting broad market pressure.

The post Bitcoin ETFs Update: Daily Net Outflows Hit $188.64M as IBIT Leads Losses appeared first on Blockonomi.

Also read: Why Ethereum (ETH) Price Is Likely to Consolidate Between $3,000 and $3,200 in Early 2026
About Author Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nunc fermentum lectus eget interdum varius. Curabitur ut nibh vel velit cursus molestie. Cras sed sagittis erat. Nullam id ante hendrerit, lobortis justo ac, fermentum neque. Mauris egestas maximus tortor. Nunc non neque a quam sollicitudin facilisis. Maecenas posuere turpis arcu, vel tempor ipsum tincidunt ut.
WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?
Related News